• Home
  • Our story
  • Our people
  • Myth busters
  • Act now
  • Visit us
  • Blog
Campaign Against Canned Hunting (CACH)

New Management Plan for SA Lions

4/23/2015

9 Comments

 
Picture
My Comments on the Biodiversity Management Plan (BMP) for Lions in SA

The SA government has finally released a proposed lion management plan (BMP)
Prepared by consultants, the 66-page report contains much useful information and is well worth the time taken to read it. 

In essence, the BMP separates lions in to three categories:
1. Wild lions (Kruger National Park, Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park)
2. Managed 'wild' lions (in 45 private nature reserves, roaming free in large fenced areas, but culled and hunted to control their numbers)
3. Captive-bred lions (in 200 lion farms breeding lions for canned hunts)
Each group is treated differently.

The report sets out to meet certain Objectives, which are listed, and here is our first complaint.  Whether or not lion farms and canned hunting should be allowed at all has been left out of the objectives. So the most important issue affecting lions in South Africa is excluded from the BMP.
You can read the full BMP here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dupfrbztm9fson6/17%20December%202014%20Vetted%20%20draft%20%20BMP%20for%20SA%20Lion%20Panthera%20Leo%20clean%20copy_1.pdf?dl=0

We urge you to read it, look at our comments below, and then send your input to the stakeholders listed in our website here:
http://www.cannedlion.org/what-you-can-do.html

The result is extremely superficial treatment of the whole issue of lion farming and canned hunting.  One or two vague references to controversy around lion farming, vague sub-objectives about tightening up some (unspecified) permit conditions sometime before 2019(!!) and that is it.

There are more than twice as many tame lions being bred for slaughter than wild lions in SA. Yet this BMP focuses on how to manage the small population of wild, or semi-wild lions, and really just touches upon the far larger captive bred lion population in passing.

We would describe the BMP as a disaster for the African lion, and when lion farming for trophies and lion bones is proved to be contributing to the extinction of the African lion, it will be cold comfort to say to the complacent bureaucrats who mis-manage our wildlife: we told you so. 
Never mind the consequences of fostering an animal welfare nightmare that will certainly have unexpected consequences (eg a boycott of SA agricultural produce, since lion farming has now been adopted by the Department of Agriculture DAFF)

Extracts from the BMP are in Italics, and my comments are in plain text below.

Objective 1
Ensure a well-managed captive lion population.
Why such a superficial objective? Why assume that lion farming has a valid conservation purpose when everyone, including the lion farmers' legal representatives, deny that this is so? Surely the first objective ought to have read: Whether lion farming for canned hunting ought to be allowed, and, if so, under what restrictions.
Consider the related issue of Tiger conservation.
The Tiger Comparison: Even CITES realised that the farming of tigers would cause the extinction of wild tigers. CITES realised:
a. That the tiger trade, being illegal, cannot be measured accurately;
b. That the effect of tiger farms on wild tigers could not be measured;
c. That farming would provide an opportunity for laundering wild specimens that would accelerate poaching;
d. That tiger farming would distract from tackling loss of habitat, loss of prey species and other illicit activities.
Accordingly, in Decision 14.69 the COP adopted this regulation:
Parties with intensive operations breeding tigers on a commercial scale shall implement measures to restrict the captive population to a level supportive only to conserving wild tigers; tigers should not be bred for trade in their parts and derivatives.
So here is the question that calls for an answer: if CITES has banned tiger farming for trade, why has the farming of lions for commercial purposes not been banned?  All the same considerations apply to both species.

Objective 2
Encourage the development of opportunities for economic and social benefits from responsibly managed wild, managed wild and captive lion populations.
Translation: explore ways to exploit wildlife, to make more money out of the animals. The word 'responsibly' is suitably ambiguous.

Sub-objectives:
2.1. Prevent illegal trade in lions and lion products while promoting and safeguarding sustainable legal trade; and
2.2. Promote sustainable legal trade in lions and lion products.
This oxymoron mirrors the confusion and muddled reasoning that characterises the debate on whether or not to legalise the trade in Rhino horn, with those who stand to make money out of rhino (rhino farmers, the SA government) being opposed by virtually every expert who understands how a legal trade will grow the illegal trade. Just as legalising the trade in Rhino horn will be the death knell for wild Rhino, so permitting the exponential growth of the lion bone trade will contribute to the extinction of wild lions.
As explained above with the example of the Tiger trade, you cannot promote a legal trade in lion parts without ipso facto promoting the illegal trade.  The one feeds the other.

The species is well managed( sic!!!) and the Scientific Authority does not have any current concerns relating to the export of lion in accordance with Article IV of the CITES as the South African lion population is included in Appendix II of CITES. In terms of Article IV of the CITES, an export permit shall only be granted for an Appendix II species when a Scientific Authority of the State of export has advised that such export will not be detrimental to the survival of that species.
The assessment only considered wild and managed wild populations of the African lion and did not consider captive populations.

Well-managed? Well managed? Do they actually believe their own propaganda? So actually, almost all of the CITES tags for exports of lion bones and trophies are in violation of CITES, because the Scientific Authority has never issued an NDF (Non-detriment finding) for farmed lions. How well managed is that?

The Convention on Biodiversity(CBD) addresses conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the use of biological and genetic resources. The CBD also provides guidelines to manage biodiversity, but does not provide specific protection for the African lion or any individual species. The only international agreement that offers specific and significant protection to the African lion is CITES.

No protection for lions? What an understatement! Actually the Convention on Biodiversity lumps lions, elephants etc in with bacteria and any other 'organism' in its definition of biological resources and then proceeds to treat lion and elephants as if they were bacteria. Is this 'well managed?' Or 'responsible?'

Permits for wild and managed wild lion hunts in South Africa are obtained on application from the appropriate provincial conservation authority, as are permits for hunting captive-bred lions. Clearly permits are not limited, given the number of captive lions hunted. Furthermore, many of the captive hunts are being reported as wild or managed wild lion hunts, and the relevant authorities are in the process of addressing the incorrect use of source codes in the issuance of permits.

How 'well managed' is this? Here we see false reporting on a broad scale. Between 1999 and 2008 CITES reports show the export of at least 5000 lions of which nearly 3000 (2962) were exported as 'wild' lions, but we know that the number of wild lions hunted in SA every year to be less than ten. So the correct total for that period should be not more than 100 wild lions. Where have all the other 2,862 'wild' lions come from?
Clearly the statistics reveal the massive extent of fraud in the SA permit system. It is easy to guess why.
Roland Ward trophy book refuses to recognise the trophies of captive bred lions - for obvious reasons. So to get around the Roland Ward ban, trophies of tame lions are being exported as 'wild' with corrupt provincial conservation officials eager and willing to certify the trophy as 'wild' - for a fee.
We have also been told by eyewitnesses, who do not wish to become involved, that some lion farmers fly their lions at night over the border in to Mozambique to be shot by canned hunters there on arrival.  The trophy is then exported fraudulently as that of a wild Mozambique lion, in order to circumvent the Rowland Ward Trophy Book refusal to recognise trophies of captive bred lions.

What a disaster for the African lion this management plan is!





9 Comments
Leanne Lang
4/28/2015 10:17:08 pm

This is a disgrace. It is a manipulation of lion numbers to serve the purpose for hunters and canned hunting. How far do these animals have to decline before something is done? When is Africa going to wake up and save their greatest asset - their wildlife? It is an absolute disgrace that canned hunting is allowed to operate with no laws to save these animals. These animals are bred for the sole purpose to be a trophy. Volunteers are told they are set free and live in the wild - this is bullshit. The world needs to wake up and start making hunters accountable for their slaughtering practice. Stop fudging numbers and tell the bloody truth.

Reply
Laura
4/28/2015 10:37:12 pm

Utter disgrace, why these poor animals can't be left alone I don't know. Why they have to be hunted in the first place is beyond a joke. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. We humans are supposed to be the more intelligent race but we can't even show compassion or sympathy to a helpless animal, yes they have claws but it's for defence. BUT what defence are claws agains a gun? Hopeless. This is disgusting and you who are apart of canned hunting should be ashamed of yourselves.

Reply
Mark
4/29/2015 02:17:08 pm

Immoral, I'm lost for words, the whole world has to unite and save these Lions, including the Lions in the wild, they need are help now to put a permanent end to canned hunting and trophy hunting,

Reply
Irina Salauyeva
4/29/2015 11:09:01 pm

Humans has taken space from them, now - life.Greed,greed,greed..Immoral dirty and criminal.. and what ever I say it's not enough,I believe..HUNTING,ANY KIND OF,MUST BE STOPPED..Killing - is not a crime anymore???..

Reply
Kathleen M Carson, D.V.M.
5/3/2015 06:23:50 am

Canned hunting is for COWARDS. What courage and bravery does it take to shoot an animal in a confined area who doesn't have a fear of humans because of the way he/she was raised? The answer? NONE,

Reply
Bruce Upton
5/5/2015 09:25:19 pm

Absolutely Disgusted with this report and I feel that All Hunting of Wild Life must be Banned. I don't believe in Trophy Hunting or any other Sport than involves Wild Life.

Reply
Tina Dobson Gaffney
5/6/2015 05:02:19 am

I am amazed beyond belief every time I read of fantasy made up reasons they make to try to get people to believe that lion farms and such is part of a preservation effort for the lion species. Do they really think we people who are fighting for the lion, a species who's near future survival is in utter shambles and disray, to say the least, even the tinest bit believe these lies? All their ignorant made up reasons are HORSESHIT and I would love to be the one who could have 1 opportunity to show each of them how I mean business, for once and for all, on what they deserve for saying things to try to brainwash and minipulate people who don't know any better, plus I'd really love to give them their due punishment for everything they participate in that we, all the good people who are fighting for the lions and other animals, know is flat out wrong, not that we think, that we know. A good person knows when something is wrong and all wrong things, "you just don't do" and a bad, evil person thinks that because they do them, it means they are not wrong and they as a person are not wrong, clearly, they are mentally lacking in morals, ethics and compassion and alot more I could keep naming. My biggest blood boiler is with the African government officials, in LETTING ANY person murder this countrys most natural, diverse, living resource, that sets Africa apart from any other continent on this earth. They are just as evil as the bad people who own/run these lion farms, canned hunting reserves as well as the other nature clubs where another bad person can go and pay money to kill an innocent animal of their choice. What needs to happen is this: all the bad people who have in the past, the ones now and in the future that has from the least participation to the most participation in any act that involves the outcome of taking a lions life, put them and any family member or friend(s) that know what they've did and supported their acts, together, naked, with no weapons, out on the savannahs of Africa, then let any and all carnivore predators chase them each down and maul them to their deserved death. This would take these bad people out of our misery and put an end to the murdering, poaching, trophy hunting cowards from ever doing their wrong deeds to the innocent animals again.

Reply
clara Almuna López
8/3/2015 10:02:09 pm

Reply
freek sopa link
9/23/2015 02:11:43 am

Canned hunting is no sport to kill defenseless animals, i will share this on a few facebookgroups including my own animal abuse group, And i hope that the power of Social Media will have some results.

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    Newsletter

    Archives

    August 2022
    January 2022
    July 2021
    May 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Animal advocacy courses are offered here:

    Subscribe to our newsletter:

Submit
PUBLIC BENEFIT NUMBER: PB0930030402        |        REG. NUMBER: 2006/036885/08   
   CACH:  P.O. BOX 54 LADISMITH 6655 SOUTH AFRICA     |     MOBILE/CELL/WHATSAPP:  +27 (0) 82 9675808
.