• Home
  • Our story
  • Our people
  • Myth busters
  • Act now
  • Visit us
  • Blog
Campaign Against Canned Hunting (CACH)

The Economics of Cub Petting

10/25/2013

2 Comments

 
Picture
The demand for cub-petting by tourists is insatiable.  

One ethical predator sanctuary in the Cape describes how it loses nearly half its potential tourist traffic - and the income that the tourists would bring, because it will not offer cub petting. Visitors phone to book a visit. The conversation goes like this:

“Do you have lion and tiger cubs for us to play with?”

“No. We do not offer cub-petting, because the only market for the cubs when they grow up is the canned hunting industry.”

“Oh….not to worry, we’ll go somewhere else.”

But for the support of philanthropists, the owners of the predator park would long ago have been obliged to decide:

1.    Do we allow breeding to produce cubs for petting? Or

2.    Do we sell or euthanise our animals and close down.

The money from cub petting is huge. Some facilities make millions of rands a month.

NSPCA staff have described how a predator park near Johannesburg undertook to abandon cub petting because of ethical concerns.  Unfortunately, the loss of income was so severe that the predator park was forced to renege on its undertaking, and bring back the cub petting.  Good intentions trumped by economics.

How can we stop tourists from the developed world indulging in cub-petting?  That responsibility falls principally on the shoulders of the animal welfare organisations in USA and Europe.  So far, most have failed the lions miserably.

However, one NGO in the Netherlands is setting a great example. 

Stichting SPOTS have an excellent initiative in Holland, which could be a model for all others - persuading the major tourist associations to adopt a Code of Practice for animal welfare.   Dutch tourism associations agree not to promote or patronise any ‘sanctuary’ in South Africa that fails to observe the five freedoms for captive animals which are enshrined in the UDAW - the Universal Declaration of Animal Welfare.  Then it would fall to the tourism industry to educate its clients on the evils of cub- petting.

S.A. lion farmers clearly would not qualify to be supported by ethical tourists, and the flow of funds would dry up. No funds, no cubs.  No cubs, no breeding. No breeding, no canned lion hunting.

So it is up to us - the animal welfare community - to persuade the tourism industry to come on board and implement an acceptable code of practice.  Come on Euro and US NGO’s, here is an important issue for you to take up.

Warning: even with a fine-looking Code of Practice and the best of intentions, it will not be easy to cut off the flow of funds to the lion farmers.   They are nothing if not resourceful and if you look at their websites, you can see how cleverly they pass themselves off as wildlife sanctuaries.  Moreover, some of them even do some useful wildlife sanctuary work with other species and that further muddies the waters.  Whilst it would be easy to blacklist, say, members of the SA Predator Breeders Association, the balloon effect would certainly happen. (if one squeezes a balloon here, it pops out over there.)


2 Comments
Linda Park
10/27/2013 06:35:15 pm

Unfortunately every single celebrity that visits this country is taken to one of these places and then posts pictures of themselves cuddling cubs and "contributing to conservation". The promoters that bring them out, together with the local magazines and papers that publish these photos, need to come on board as well. We should be encouraging the viewing of wildlife in the wild, not perpetuating the myth that it is normal to cuddle wild animals. This whole money making industry is shameful and certainly not something South Africa should be proud of and offering as part of a tourism package.

Reply
Jill Mortimer
10/27/2013 09:51:32 pm

The difficult part is to educate the tourists that cub petting is WRONG.
The big problem: How to get the word out to tourists (and the locals)? Facebook? Large graphic notices at hotels (if they allow) or at prominent places where they would not be overlooked.
The places that allow this despicable practice should be named and shamed - in a very public manner. Anyway that can be thought of.

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    Newsletter

    Archives

    July 2021
    May 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Animal advocacy courses are offered here:

    Subscribe to our newsletter:

Submit
PUBLIC BENEFIT NUMBER: PB0930030402        |        REG. NUMBER: 2006/036885/08   
   CACH:  P.O. BOX 54 LADISMITH 6655 SOUTH AFRICA     |     MOBILE/CELL/WHATSAPP:  +27 (0) 82 9675808
.